Elettra-Sincrotrone Trieste S.C.p.A. website uses technical, analytics and third party cookies, in order to collect anonymous statistical informations.
Website navigation do not affect users' privacy during their browsing experience on our website, as they do not entail processing their personal identification data.
Session cookies are not permanently stored and indeed are cancelled when the browser has quit.
The technical cookies also improve or customise the browsing experience and are necessary to the website provided by Elettra - Sincrotrone Trieste S.C.p.A. to function properly.
More info
OK
SAXS beamline
Page 5 of 6
Calibrants
|
At the SAXS beamline various standards are used for the angular (s-scale) calibration of the different detectors:
-
Rat tail tendon for the SAXS detector - high resolution (rtt*.dat)
-
Silver behenate for the SAXS detector – medium and low resolution (agbeh*.dat)
-
Para-bromo benzoic acid for the WAXS detector – WAXS range 1 and 2 (pbromo*.dat)
-
Combination of Cu, Al foils and Si powder for the WAXS detector – WAXS range 2 and higher
In Figure 1 a typical diffraction pattern of rat tail tendon is shown, depicting the diffraction orders (from the first to the 14thorder) measured with a "high" resolution set-up (2.3 m) and the delay-line gas detector. The d-spacing is assumed to be 650 Å, but this value can vary depending on humidity up to 3%. Thus, the rat tail tendon is often used only to determine the position of the direct beam (zero order), while the absolute calibration is performed using the diffraction pattern of Silver behenate powder. Fig. 2 depicts a diffraction pattern of Silver behenate measured with "medium" resolution set-up (1.0 m) from the first to the 4thorder (repeat spacing 58.4 Å) [1].
|
Figure 1. SAXS diffraction pattern of the collagen structure of rat tail tendon fibre at a distance of 2.3 m
|
Figure 2. SAXS diffraction pattern of Ag behenate powder at a distance of 1.0 m
|
In Figure 3 a typical WAXS pattern of p-bromo benzoic acid is shown. The diffraction peaks are indexed according to the values given in Table 2, taken from [2].
Table 2. d-spacings and relative intensities of p-bromo benzoic acid according to [2].
d-spacing/Å |
rel. intensity |
d-spacing/Å |
rel. intensity |
14.72 |
18000 |
4.25 |
490 |
7.36 |
1200 |
3.96 |
2380 |
6.02 |
330 |
3.84 |
10300 |
5.67 |
980 |
3.74 |
26530 |
5.21 |
6550 |
3.68 |
1740 |
4.72 |
26000 |
3.47 |
760 |
Figure 3. Calculated diffraction pattern of p-bromo benzoic acid. d-spacings are given in Å.
Table 3. d-spacings and 2 theta values for several calibration standards
Calibration Standard
|
d-spacing/Å
|
2theta @ 5.4 keV
|
2theta @ 8 keV
|
2theta @ 16 keV
|
Aluminium foil (Al)
|
|
2.338
|
58.4
|
38.5
|
19.0
|
2.024
|
68.6
|
44.7
|
21.9
|
1.431
|
105.6
|
65.1
|
31.2
|
1.221
|
138.0
|
78.2
|
36.8
|
1.169
|
154.4
|
82.4
|
38.5
|
1.012
|
-
|
99.0
|
44.7
|
Copper foil (Cu)
|
|
3.615
|
37.0
|
24.8
|
12.3
|
2.556
|
53.4
|
35.3
|
17.4
|
2.087
|
66.7
|
43.6
|
21.4
|
1.808
|
78.9
|
50.8
|
24.8
|
1.617
|
90.5
|
57.3
|
27.7
|
1.476
|
102.1
|
63.3
|
30.4
|
1.278
|
127.8
|
74.6
|
35.3
|
1.205
|
144.6
|
80.0
|
37.5
|
Silicon powder (Si)
|
|
3.134
|
42.7
|
28.4
|
14.1
|
1.919
|
72.9
|
47.3
|
23.1
|
1.637
|
88.3
|
56.1
|
27.2
|
1.357
|
114.3
|
69.1
|
33.0
|
1.245
|
132.5
|
76.4
|
36.0
|
Boron Lanthanum (LaB6)
|
|
4.15785 |
|
21.353
|
|
2.93927 |
|
30.386
|
|
2.39986 |
|
37.444
|
|
2.07803 |
|
43.516
|
|
1.85865 |
|
48.986
|
|
1.69690 |
|
53.994 |
|
1.46974 |
|
63.216
|
|
1.38538 |
|
67.562
|
|
1.31438 |
|
71.755
|
|
1.25332 |
|
75.847
|
|
1.20003 |
|
79.867
|
|
1.15290 |
|
83.847
|
|
1.11100 |
|
87.790
|
|
Sodium Chloride (NaCl)
|
|
3.258
|
|
27.3504
|
|
2.821
|
|
31.6907
|
|
1.994
|
|
45.4470
|
|
1.701
|
|
53.8498
|
|
1.628
|
|
56.4749
|
|
1.410
|
|
66.2239
|
|
1.294
|
|
73.0605
|
|
1.261
|
|
75.2983
|
|
1.1515
|
|
83.9660
|
|
The s-scale for both, the SAXS and the WAXS range, can be obtained by linear regression, i.e., the linear relation between the known s-values of the calibrant versus the measured peak positions has to be found. A further correction is regarding the flat field response (efficiency) of the detectors. For this correction, the fluorescence light of various foils are used to illuminate the detectors rather homogeneously:
At 8 keV: iron foil (100 mm thick), fluorescence energy: 6.4 keV Ka, 7.1 keV Kb (effic*.dat)
At 16 keV: copper foil (> 100 mm thick), fluorescence energy: 8.028 keV Ka2, 8.048 keV Ka1, 8.905 keV Kb (effic*.dat)
The measured scattering pattern are corrected for the detector efficiency simply by dividing them by the fluorescence pattern. Note: The average of the detector efficiency data should be set to unity and a small threshold should be applied to avoid any division by zero.
[1] T.N. Blanton et. al., Powder Diffraction 10, (1995), 91
[2] K. Ohura, S. Kashino, M. Haisa, J. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 45, (1972), 2651 |
Last Updated on Thursday, 24 March 2022 17:46